Public Client Group Attorneys

Experienced Legal Representation for State and Local Governments, Municipalities, and Public Entities

Public entities face increasingly complex legal, regulatory, environmental, and public policy challenges that require experienced legal counsel with the knowledge, resources and litigation experience to achieve meaningful results. At Napoli Shkolnik, our Public Client Practice is built on decades of successfully representing state and local governments, counties, cities, municipalities, school districts, public utilities, water systems, transportation authorities, and other governmental entities in high-stakes litigation and complex legal matters nationwide.

Trusted Counsel for Government Agencies and Public Institutions

Nuestra public client attorneys are recognized leaders with decades of experience in the legal profession, trusted not only for their courtroom advocacy, but also for helping public clients protect taxpayer resources, recover public funds, address environmental contamination, respond to public health crises, and hold corporations accountable for conduct that harms communities. From pre-litigation strategy through trial and appeal, we provide practical legal guidance tailored to the unique responsibilities of government agencies and public institutions.

Napoli Shkolnik has earned a national reputation for representing public entities in some of the country's most significant and precedent-setting litigation. Our attorneys have been appointed to leadership positions in major multidistrict litigations (MDLs), mass tort proceedings, environmental cases, and other complex actions involving nationwide public interests.

The strength of our practice is reflected in the leadership of our attorneys. Our lawyers are recognized throughout the legal profession for their courtroom advocacy, strategic litigation leadership, and commitment to advancing the interests of governmental clients. They regularly publish articles in respected legal and industry publications, present at national conferences, and educate public officials and legal professionals on emerging legal developments affecting government entities. Their experience allows us to provide practical, forward-looking counsel informed by the latest legal developments and litigation strategies.

Leadership That Strengthens Our Advocacy

Our commitment to public service extends beyond litigation. Napoli Shkolnik proudly serves as Counsel to the National Rural Water Association (NRWA), supporting more than 30,000 members nationwide, and as an Excelsior Partner of the New York State Association of Counties (NYSAC). Our attorneys also hold leadership positions within the Asociación Americana para la Justicia (AAJ), including serving as Litigation Group Chairs, serve as Officers of the Asociación de Abogados Litigantes del Estado de Nueva York (NYSTLA), and maintain active roles in numerous national, state, and local legal, governmental, and industry organizations.

Whether advising government agencies on emerging legal risks, pursuing complex recovery litigation, or representing public entities in landmark cases, Napoli Shkolnik delivers the experience, strategic leadership, and unwavering advocacy public clients depend on.

Our mission is simple: to help governments protect public resources, strengthen the communities they serve, and achieve lasting results through effective legal representation.

Areas of Expertise

The manufacturers of prescription opioids grossly misrepresented the risks of long-term use of those drugs for persons with chronic pain. The distributors failed to properly monitor suspicious orders of those prescription drugs—all of which contributed to the current opioid epidemic. The pharmacies filled those prescriptions ignoring red flags.

While these defendants made record profits, counties, cities, and municipalities were left with an addicted population to care for. Public authorities are entitled under federal and/or state law to recover these costs due to the defendants' negligence.

To date, national settlements have been reached with Janssen, Cardinal, McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart. Funding from these settlements has begun to flow into our communities. The firm is still in litigation against defendants across the country.

Napoli Shkolnik represents the municipal governments of Buffalo and Rochester in two separate lawsuits against the gun industry.

The suits are brought under a law signed in 2021, which makes it illegal for participants in the gun industry to contribute to a condition that “endangers the safety or health of the public through the sale, manufacturing, importing, or marketing of an illegal firearm.”

Co-defendants include Bushmaster Firearms, Vintage Firearms, Smith & Wesson Brands, Beretta USA Corp, Colt’s Manufacturing Co., and Glock. Napoli Shkolnik is proud to represent the cities of Rochester and Buffalo in these landmark lawsuits, aimed at limiting the use of firearms in violent crimes and improving safety and quality of life in both cities.

Second Circuit Clears Path for Gun Violence Victims and New York Communities to Pursue Civil Accountability, reports Napoli Shkolnik

La Ley Federal de Agua Limpia permite que “cualquier ciudadano”, incluidas ciudades, condados y municipios, busque reparación por daños ambientales en los tribunales. Esta reparación generalmente incluye compensación financiera, mandatos judiciales permanentes y otras medidas de reparación.

At Napoli Shkolnik, our public client practice group primarily focuses on a number of environmental contamination issues, such as:

Accepting New Clients: Begin Your Claim Today!

Multiplan has historically used algorithms for out-of-network reimbursements, which has caught the attention of Congress, prompting investigations and potential regulatory action. The company’s revenue is directly tied to its ability to reduce insurers’ costs, as it receives a percentage of the savings it provides to these insurers. Certain insurance companies have also been sued for their participation in the hub-and-spoke conspiracy to fix prices and eliminate market competition.

On the surface, MultiPlan claimed to use data analytics to help insurers optimize the design of their benefit plans. Notwithstanding, in practice, its data models were designed primarily to minimize the amount insurance companies have to pay for out-of-network care - an approach explored further in Pricing Algorithms Help Insurers and Harm Patients, which explains how such opaque pricing tools systematically undercut fair reimbursement and shift costs onto providers and patients alike.

MultiPlan's practices place significant financial strain on providers, particularly concerning out-of-network services where payment rates are often so low that they do not cover operating costs.

Adding another layer of complexity, What the MultiPlan MDL Tells Us About Rebrands During Litigation highlights how companies under scrutiny may attempt strategic rebranding while litigation is ongoing, hoping to distance themselves from harmful past practices without meaningfully changing them. .

We represent a multitude of healthcare providers in their antitrust and price-fixing claims against MultiPlan and insurance companies throughout the United States. As of this moment, the firm represents 73 Direct Action Purchasers (“DAPs”) in In Re: MultiPlan Health Insurance Provider Litigation, MDL 3121, including the American Medical Association, Illinois State Medical Society (ISMS), Nassau University Medical Center (NUMC), and a multitude of plastic/general surgery centers, substance use disorder and mental health treatment providers, physical therapy groups, clinics and individual practitioners.

The Insulin Pricing Scheme class action lawsuit brought by consumers in multiple states claims the defendants, all major players in the pharma industry, engineered insulin price increases via an opaque, conspiratorial kickback scheme. This has exponentially increased their profits at the expense of payors.

Partner Hunter J. Shkolnik was appointed to the Plaintiff’s Executive Committee for the Self-Funded Payer Track Insulin Pricing Litigation, which means the firm is at the forefront and leading the charge for plaintiffs in coordinated civil litigation in the District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Napoli Shkolnik represents multiple school boards in coordinated litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against major social media corporations like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube. The platforms are accused of being defective, designed to maximize screen time and encourage addictive behavior in adolescents, leading to various emotional and physical harms.

The impact of social media on children has also burdened school districts with significant costs. The litigation highlights how financial growth has been prioritized over the well-being of U.S. students.

In her recent article When Social Platforms Profit and Schools Pay – Why Districts Are Suing Tech Giants Over Youth Mental Health,  Partner Shayna E. Sacos examines how these lawsuits are drawing national attention to the substantial and often overlooked costs that social media imposes on public school systems. The piece analyzes the legal foundations of these claims, the mounting evidence of harm to students, and the measures districts are pursuing to hold technology companies accountable for their role in the growing youth mental health crisis.

Corporations produce over 400 million metric tons of plastic per year, and this amount is expected to triple by 2060. Napoli Shkolnik has filed lawsuits to hold plastic polluters accountable for cleanup expenses, with defendants like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo contributing a large portion of the world's plastic pollution.

Preguntas frecuentes

State law encompasses the legal rules and regulations established by a state's legislature and interpreted by its courts. These laws regulate various aspects of life within the state, including criminal justice, civil disputes, business practices, and family law, and can differ significantly from one state to another.

We do not charge anything for an initial consultation.

Yes, we do. The majority of our clients opt for contingency fee arrangements, where we charge no legal fees unless we successfully recover monetary damages through a jury verdict, settlement, or other means. If no damages are recovered, the client owes us no attorney fees. The percentage of the damages paid as legal fees is negotiated at the outset and formalized in a written contingency agreement.

Let our extensive experience work for you at no charge.

From the state and federal courts to the supreme court, our law firm is ready to pursue justice for municipal entities. Call us today for a CONSULTA GRATIS. We handle these matters on a nationwide basis.

We Provide A Free Consultation

Nombre(Requerido)
For which of the following areas would you like to be contacted (select all that apply)?(Requerido)

Can Undocumented Immigrants File a Personal Injury Lawsuit? Know Your Rights 

If you were injured at work or in an accident and you are undocumented, or unsure of your immigration status, you may be wondering whether you can seek...

Leer el artículo
7 Most Common Medical Malpractice Claims

Medical professionals are trusted to provide safe, competent care, but mistakes can happen. When a healthcare provider’s negligence causes serious injury, illness, or death, patients and their families may...

Leer el artículo
School District Social Media Lawsuits Against Meta, TikTok, Snap & YouTube

Why School Districts Are Suing Social Media Companies  Across the United States, a legal reckoning is underway. More than 1,400 school districts have filed lawsuits against the social media giants, Meta...

Leer el artículo
[/columna]
¿Como podemos ayudarte?
Contáctenos:
Obtenga una evaluación gratuita de su caso Abogados
Asentamientos en esta área
Ver todos los asentamientos
[/fila]

Nuestras ubicaciones

Por favor Contáctenos para una cita en persona