{"id":5937,"date":"2018-08-28T13:49:32","date_gmt":"2018-08-28T17:49:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/practiceareas\/defective-takata-airbag-injuries\/"},"modified":"2022-06-21T16:54:55","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T20:54:55","slug":"takata-defectuoso-airbag-lesiones","status":"publish","type":"practiceareas","link":"https:\/\/www.napolilaw.com\/es\/areas-de-practica-2\/takata-defectuoso-airbag-lesiones\/","title":{"rendered":"Lesiones por bolsas de aire Takata defectuosas"},"content":{"rendered":"

En muchos sentidos, la historia de la bolsa de aire defectuosa de Takata es una cuento familiar<\/a>. A company desperate to optimize profits substitutes cheap ingredients and materials for more expensive and robust ones. Executives believe that no one will notice and they pat themselves on the back for their ingenuity.<\/p>\n

It took many years for the full extent of the Takata defective airbag scandal to come to light. For many years, company officials denied the problem and government regulators did not ask many questions. Eventually, cornered corporate heads admitted fault, government officials levied huge fines, and Takata declared bankruptcy. Many assumed that the nightmare was over.<\/p>\n

However, that\u2019s not the case. In most Responsabilidad del producto<\/a> cases, most potential victims never receive notice of the defect. Companies continue to look for the easy way out. So, they send the minimum number of notices. With regard to automobile defects, that usually means sending recall notices to record owners. But many cars manufactured in the 1990s are on at least their third or fourth owner. These individuals may have no idea that they are essentially driving time bombs.<\/p>\n

Takata almost got away with it. For a number of years, no one knew about the dangerous airbags inside passenger cars. But corporate irresponsibility of this magnitude could not stay under wraps forever. As of January 2019, vehicle manufacturers have recalled over 50 million defective airbags, and there are at least another 10 million on the recall list.<\/p>\n

Even more tragically, many people probably do not know their vehicle has been recalled. Cars and trucks which are more than ten years old may be on their second, third, or even fourth owner. Since recall notices go out to original purchasers, these potential victims are completely in the dark.<\/p>\n

Assertive Ley de N\u00e1poles<\/a> attorneys do more than obtain compensation for victims. They also hold companies, like Takata, responsible for their misdeeds. Other law firms are afraid to take on large multinational manufacturers. These companies have almost unlimited resources, and they fight liability lawsuits tooth and nail. But to our lawyers, these companies are just like the ones we\u2019ve taken on before. We used proven methods to get results in those cases, and these methods will work for you as well.<\/p>\n

\u00c9l abogados de Napoli Law<\/a> trabajar duro para hacer las cosas bien en estas situaciones. Por nuestra experiencia, sabemos sortear las trabas legales que suelen desplegar estas empresas. Adem\u00e1s, debido a nuestra compasi\u00f3n, entendemos el alcance total de su dolor y sufrimiento por su lesi\u00f3n con la bolsa de aire Takata. Finalmente, debido a nuestra tenacidad, no nos conformamos con nada menos que el mejor resultado posible dadas las circunstancias.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

La historia de las bolsas de aire Takata<\/h2>\n

El retiro del mercado de bolsas de aire en curso, que comenz\u00f3 en 2013, tiene ra\u00edces profundas. En 1995, los reguladores estadounidenses retiraron del mercado m\u00e1s de ocho millones de veh\u00edculos con cinturones de seguridad Takata defectuosos. Los pestillos se soltaron inesperadamente, a veces durante accidentes automovil\u00edsticos<\/a>. At first, company officials blamed customer misuse for the problem. But, regulators finally determined the truth.<\/p>\n

History repeats itself. There is evidence that Takata knew about the airbag dangers about a decade before the first airbag recall. Between 2003 and 2013, airbag defects caused over a hundred deaths and serious injuries in the United States and overseas.<\/p>\n

Predictably, Takata moved slowly. Company officials promised additional oversight and better quality control measures, but did nothing. Executives also insisted that environmental problems, which they could not control, caused the airbag defects.<\/p>\n

While company officials did absolutely nothing and government regulators did basically nothing, abogados de lesiones personales se pusieron a trabajar<\/a>. Cuando otros se encogen en el banquillo y se niegan a proteger a las v\u00edctimas, los abogados asertivos toman la iniciativa. En el verano de 2014, una mujer embarazada muri\u00f3 cuando la bolsa de aire de su auto explot\u00f3 en una colisi\u00f3n a baja velocidad. Su hijo solo sobrevivi\u00f3 unos pocos d\u00edas. Menos de seis meses despu\u00e9s de que se presentara una demanda, la Administraci\u00f3n Nacional de Seguridad del Tr\u00e1fico finalmente se subi\u00f3 al caballo y orden\u00f3 un retiro del mercado.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

El problema que no desaparece<\/h3>\n

AIrbags are marvelous machines. In only a fraction of a second, crash sensors trigger chemical reactions which superheat chemical propellants. These propellants expand very, very rapidly yet they do not explode. That action safely inflates the airbag and saves lives.<\/p>\n

For years, Takata airbags used a chemical propellant called tetrazole. When exposed to heat, this chemical always safely and quickly expands. It never suddenly and violently explodes. The company insisted that the new propellant, ammonium nitrate, was effective and safe.<\/p>\n

However, ammonium nitrate is highly unstable. Furthermore, while it has expansive properties, like tetrazole, it also has explosive properties, much like gasoline fumes. When ammonium nitrate is suddenly heated, either event could occur.<\/p>\n

So, there is just no way to tell what will happen. Takata airbags could suddenly explode and cause injury even after the driver bumps a curb. Under established product liability standards, that\u2019s simply not acceptable.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00bfPor qu\u00e9 las bolsas de aire Takata son defectuosas?<\/h2>\n

In a high-speed collision, airbags rapidly inflate, creating a soft yet impenetrable barrier between front seat passengers and the steering wheel or dashboard. At least, that\u2019s how it is supposed to work.<\/p>\n

Airbags rely on a delicate mixture propellant mixture. The airbag must inflate extremely rapidly but not explode. Quality propellants like these are expensive and difficult to find. So, in the late 1990s, Takata modified its manufacturing process. The company began using ammonium nitrate as a propellant. This dangerous substance is basically the same chemical that\u2019s used in some roadside bombs. Furthermore, a tiny amount of moisture can cause the chemical to liquefy, resulting in Takata airbag injuries.<\/p>\n

This inherent instability, along with excess moisture, causes serious problems. The liquid disrupts the sensors. So, the airbag may inflate even in low-speed collisions. Moreover, ammonium nitrate\u2019s explosive properties sometimes shatter the metal inside the steering column, showering the victims with shrapnel.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00bfQu\u00e9 es la privacidad del contrato?<\/h3>\n

As mentioned earlier, many victims with defective Takata airbag related injuries did not purchase their vehicles directly from the manufacturer. So, there is no privity of contract between the victim and Takata. In many states, the obscure \u201cprivity of contract\u201d rule cuts off product liability claims in these cases.<\/p>\n

But things are different in the Empire State, because of 1970\u2019s Mendel v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. In this case, the Court of Appeals allowed a victim to recover in a product liability case even though there was no privity of contract between the parties.<\/p>\n

Most product liability claims involve a breach of warranty. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, all goods must:<\/p>\n