Airplane mechanics are much more than just women and men with wrenches. These individuals are highly-trained, and highly-paid, professionals with a high degree of skill in a number of areas. For example, General Aviation mechanics must work on everything from single-seat propeller aircraft to sophisticated jets that carry more than a dozen passengers. Specifically, airplane mechanics must repair current problems and predict future failures.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, mechanically-related casos de accidentes de avi\u00f3n<\/a> present some intricate legal issues. It is not easy to determine fault and establish liability. The mechanic can also raise a number of effective defenses in these proceedings.<\/p>\n Given all these complexities, you need an effective lawyer to stand up for your rights in the event of an aviation crash. At Ley de N\u00e1poles<\/a>, nuestros abogados de accidentes de aviaci\u00f3n son profesionales altamente experimentados y dedicados. Tienen las herramientas que necesitan para construir un caso ganador. Quiz\u00e1s lo m\u00e1s importante es que tienen la pasi\u00f3n de llevar el caso hasta el final. Esta combinaci\u00f3n a menudo produce resultados que superan sus expectativas.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In many ways, airplane mechanics have almost a fiduciary duty towards airplane owners and passengers. Like a stock broker, a mechanic has almost unlimited access to a very personal asset. Like a lawyer, a mechanic is the only person between the aircraft owner and a potential tragedy. And like a doctor, an airplane owner is entirely dependent on the mechanic to keep the aircraft safe.<\/p>\n As a result, the standard of care is much higher in these cases than it is in car crashes. The Code of Federal Regulations sets out an airplane mechanic\u2019s high duty in this realm. That duty includes:<\/p>\n Estos est\u00e1ndares de la FAA son solo el m\u00ednimo. Legalmente, los mec\u00e1nicos y otros profesionales deben cumplir o superar el est\u00e1ndar de la industria. Seg\u00fan el \u00e1rea geogr\u00e1fica, el tipo de aeronave y otros factores, el est\u00e1ndar de la industria podr\u00eda ser mucho m\u00e1s alto.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Una vez que un abogado establece el est\u00e1ndar adecuado de atenci\u00f3n, comienza el verdadero trabajo. Las v\u00edctimas\/demandantes tienen la carga de la prueba en esta \u00e1rea. As\u00ed, adem\u00e1s del deber legal, deben establecer:<\/p>\n Las defensas comunes en el mantenimiento inadecuado de aeronaves y otros casos de negligencia incluyen la negligencia contributiva y la asunci\u00f3n del riesgo. La negligencia contributiva es b\u00e1sicamente una forma de echarle la culpa del accidente a la v\u00edctima. Estas afirmaciones a menudo incluyen acusaciones de error del piloto<\/a>.<\/p>\n Assumption of the risk is a similar doctrine. But there is a big difference between getting into a plane, which has a theoretical risk of crashing, and getting into a plane which the person knows to be unreasonably dangerous.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Once fault is established, the battle is not over yet. At Napoli Law, we are committed to both justice and compensation in these cases. Compensation is sometimes hard to obtain. The FAA usually does not require mechanics to carry insurance.<\/p>\n So, vicarious liability is often important in these claims. Third party liability gives a victim\/plaintiff an additional source of compensation. Some common theories include:<\/p>\n New York and most other states are modified joint and several liability states. If there are multiple tortfeasors, the judge usually apportions damages among them based on their percentage of fault.<\/p>\nDeber en casos de mantenimiento inadecuado<\/h2>\n
\n
Establecimiento de negligencia en casos de mantenimiento inadecuado<\/h2>\n
\n
Cuestiones de responsabilidad<\/h2>\n
\n